Loading...
No BYH to Trump voters, you elected a bulldozer to our norms, institutions and very stability. and whatever happens...

Blind or not, court will weigh

020417Campbell

Tom Campbell

Loading…

Saturday, January 12, 2019

The year 2019 was only four days old when we got the announcement the U.S. Supreme Court was going to hear arguments on North Carolina’s redistricting lawsuit in March. Once again, our state will be in the political spotlight. In addition to being surprised, how should we interpret this announcement?

Plaintiffs rejoiced, believing the highest court in the land was once and for all going to reaffirm that gerrymandering elective districts so as to favor one party over another disenfranchised voters who belonged to the minority party, thus unconstitutionally dictating election outcomes by violating the First and 14th Amendments, as well as portions of Article 1 of the U. S. Constitution. They want specificity of what is and isn’t unconstitutional gerrymandering.

The state represents the defendants, our legislature, and the were equally happy, convinced the court will once and for all declare that gerrymandering, so long as it wasn’t racial gerrymandering, was permissible.

Last year, the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ordered that new congressional districts be drawn in our state, but the Supreme Court declared that the 2016 maps be used, since the verdict was handed down close to the Nov. 8th election.

North Carolina legislators have been unabashed in their political partisanship, with one leader giddily admitting that they drew maps that would virtually guarantee that 10 of our 13 congressional seats would be held by Republicans. Further, the only reason that they didn’t go for 11 or 12 was because they couldn’t figure out how to do it. Having previously been found guilty of racial gerrymandering, they didn’t want to wander into those chilly waters again.

This case will draw nationwide attention for two reasons. Most everyone is hopeful that the Supreme Court finally and definitively spell out what is and isn’t acceptable regarding redistricting. More importantly, this will be the first time since Justice John Kennedy retired and Brett Kavanaugh was sworn in that a redistricting case will be heard. Kennedy was the swing vote that sided with liberals in ruling that partisan redistricting was unconstitutional, a decision that stopped short of providing a litmus test. Now that Kennedy is no longer on the bench there is widespread speculation about how a clearly Republican and conservative plurality will rule.

North Carolina has been a major player in trying to influence election outcomes, both in drawing congressional and legislative districts as well as in judicial elections. Our legislature, clearly angered by courts that ruled many of their actions unconstitutional, believed the way to correct the situation was to put more Republicans on the bench.

To accomplish these goals, they required that all judicial candidates list their political affiliation on the ballot, then last year did away with judicial primary elections altogether, a move that clearly backfired.

Anita Earls defeated an incumbent Republican justice in the sole state supreme court race, giving that court a 5-2 Democratic majority, where it had previously been 4-3. And the Court of Appeals now has an 8-7 Republican edge after three Democrats were elected.

We need reminding of the blindfolded Lady Justice, her blindfold signifying objectivity without fear or favor, regardless of money, power or politics. In her hands she holds scales that weigh decisions based on evidence.

How are those scales measuring justice today?

Tom Campbell is former assistant state treasurer and creator and host of NC SPIN, a statewide panel discussion that airs at 7:30 p.m. Friday and 12:30 p.m. Sunday on UNC-TV. Contact him at www.ncspin.com.

Loading…

Humans of Greenville

@HumansofGville

Local photographer Joe Pellegrino explores Greenville to create a photographic census of its people.

Op Ed

January 19, 2019

“Drain the swamp!” was one of those memorable Donald Trump campaign promises that remains unfulfilled, much like “Mexico will pay for the wall!” and “Repeal and replace Obamacare!” with “something terrific.”

Unlike the latter two promises,…

Senate EPA Wheeler-1

January 19, 2019

As state superintendent of North Carolina’s public schools, I often hear from other leaders that standardized tests help hold students, teachers and schools accountable. Accountability is important for our schools but also for our leaders. The testing system that the education-industrial…

Mark Johnson

January 19, 2019

Imagine traveling from Raleigh to Charlotte in about 22 minutes; not by train, plane or car, but instead in a pod, transported through an almost friction-free tunnel. This concept is under experimentation right now, as nearly 1,000 learned last week at the N.C. Transportation Summit.

Sponsored by…

020417Campbell

January 17, 2019

President Trump's political strategy is completely clear: use his persistent promotion of a border wall to energize his core supporters. His campaign manager, Brad Parscale, told Fox News that "border security" is the "No. 1 reason" those ardent advocates will vote to re-elect him. Trump himself…

Steve and Cokie Roberts

January 17, 2019

Since the Knights of Columbus recently became a political issue, I've seen a constant refrain on social media that goes something along the lines of: "What do you mean, the pancake breakfast guys?" The point being: Could you be picking on nicer guys? But the Knights' goodness goes far beyond…

kathrynlopez

January 17, 2019

The Post's report that President Trump "has gone to extraordinary lengths to conceal details of his conversations with Russian President Vladimir Putin" — including taking away an interpreter's notes and instructing the person not to discuss what was said even with senior officials of his own…

Marc_Thiessen

January 16, 2019

As you may have heard by now, there was a rather maddening side story to the veto override votes that took place during the week between Christmas and New Year's Day at the North Carolina General Assembly. As commentator Thomas Mills rightfully pointed out on the website Politics NC, had all…

Rob Schofield

January 16, 2019

Here are a couple of easy immigration questions — answerable with a simple "yes" or "no" — we might ask any American of any political stripe: Does everyone in the world have a right to live in the U.S.? Do the American people have a right, through their elected representatives, to…

Walter Williams

January 15, 2019

LOS ANGELES TIMES

With the conspicuous exception of President Trump and some of his supporters, Americans were appalled when it was revealed that Russian “troll farms” had launched a disinformation campaign on social media designed to influence the 2016 election. But online deception…

January 15, 2019

U.S. Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., defeated Democrat Deborah Ross in 2016 in a race infused with $55 million in outside money.

We already knew North Carolina’s senior U.S. senator was awash in NRA cash. We already knew the pro-gun group spent $5.6 million in 2016 against his Democratic opponent,…

Senate 2016 North Carolina Debate-2
321 stories in Op Ed. Viewing 1 through 10.
«First Page   «Previous Page        
Page 1 of 33
        Next Page»   Last Page»